Act on Mass has taken a public stance on five ballot questions this year. Act on Mass’ ballot question positions are determined by its board of directors and staff. Please reach out to info@actonmass.org if you have a question about any of these positions.
YES on Question 1: Expanding the Public Records Law
Act on Mass is recommending a YES vote on Question 1, which would apply the state’s existing public records law to the Legislature and Governor’s office. This would bring our state legislators and governor in line with their counterparts in most other states, as well as almost all other public officials in Massachusetts.
Here are some resources to learn more about Act on Mass’ position and the impacts of Question 1:
- “Vote YES on 1 for sunshine in state government!,” blog post by Act on Mass, Oct. 2026
- “Battle over transparency on Beacon Hill will be on the ballot in November,” 7 News Boston, Oct. 2026
- “SPJ names State of Massachusetts recipient of 2026 Black Hole Award,” Society of Professional Journalists, March 2026
NO on Question 3: All Party Primaries
Act on Mass is recommending a NO vote on Question 3, which would replace our state’s primary election system with an “all-party primary.” Under this system, all candidates would be placed on one ballot, with the top two vote-getters advance to the November election. It is currently in use in California and Washington. This system increases the cost and length of elections, advantaging well-funded candidates and decreasing voter choice. Act on Mass stands with a coalition of progressive and labor groups advocating for NO on 3.
Here are some resources to learn more about Act on Mass’ position and the potential impacts of Question 3:
- “Question 3 is Bad for Democracy, and Funded by Private Equity,” Act on Mass blog post, Sept. 2026
- “Why Vote No?,” Vote No on 3 Coalition, 2026
- “How an all-party primary in Mass. would undermine democracy,” Boston Globe op-ed by Robert Kuttner, May 2026
- “How California primaries create special interest-fueled races with Democratic infighting,” Sacramento Bee, June 2022
YES on Question 4: Election Day Voter Registration
Act on Mass is recommending a YES vote on Question 4, which would allow Massachusetts voters to register to vote on Election Day with proof of residency. Currently, 21 states and the District of Columbia currently allow voters to register on election day. It is associated with higher voter turnout and fewer eligible voters being turned away on election day.
Here are some resources to learn more about Act on Mass’ position and the potential impacts of Question 4:
- “When election day is moving day,” from AOM Executive Director Scotia Hille, Aug. 2026
- Act on Mass Priority Bill: Same Day Voter Registration
- “Globe endorses Yes on Question 4,” by Boston Globe Editorial Board, Oct. 2026
NO on Question 5: Revenue and Spending Limits
Act on Mass is recommending a NO vote on Question 5, which would adjust the limit for how much revenue the state is allowed to collect in a given year. Massachusetts law 62F triggers rebates to taxpayers when state revenue collection outpaces wage and salary growth. Question 5 would trigger more often, limiting the state’s ability to recover from recession and forcing cuts to state and local public services. As Question 5’s dark money backers intend, this would wipe out the gains of the Fair Share Amendment, costing the state as much as $1.3 billion per year. We are proud to stand with progressive and labor allies in saying NO on 5.
Here are some resources to learn more about Act on Mass’ position and the potential impacts of Question 5:
- “Protect Massachusetts Future,” No on 5 Campaign
- “Making automatic tax refunds more frequent and less predictable,” nonpartisan analysis of Question 5 from the Tufts Center for Policy Analysis
- “Right-Wing Multi-Millionaires Are Pushing a Restrictive Cap on State Investment in Education, Healthcare, & Local Aid,” Question 5 Fact Sheet
YES on Question 10, 11, or 12: Legislative Stipend Reform (non-binding, in select districts)

Act on Mass is recommending a YES vote on a non-binding question that will be asked in eight state house districts, seen above. A YES vote would instruct local legislators to vote to reduce the House Speaker and Senate president’s control of legislator stipends (extra pay). It would also affirm that extra pay should only be granted to legislators who do “significant extra work that is transparent and accountable to the public.” This question is part of an ongoing reform effort to reduce leadership’s control over legislator pay, to promote legislator independence and transparent lawmaking practices. For more details, visit our website page.
Here are some resources to learn more about Act on Mass’ position and the potential impacts of the stipend reform question:
- “In the Massachusetts Legislature, nearly everyone is a leader. Just look at their paychecks.” Boston Globe, August 2024
- “What’s broken and why it matters,” Massachusetts Stipend Reform campaign
- “Stipend Reform Local Ballot Question,” overview by Act on Mass
This question will be the final ballot question on every ballot it appears on, so make sure to keep reading! To determine whether it will be 10, 11, or 12 in your community, visit this page.
